var xxx = {}
var yyy = {};
for (let i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
yyy[`key${i}`] = i;
}
function isEmpty(v) {
for (const _ in xxx) { return false }
return true;
}
Object.keys(xxx) === 0
Object.keys(yyy) === 0
JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}"
JSON.stringify(yyy) === "{}"
isEmpty(xxx);
isEmpty(yyy);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
object.keys() | |
JSON.stringify() | |
for in |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
object.keys() | 3794875.0 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify() | 1298410.6 Ops/sec |
for in | 3688980.0 Ops/sec |
What is being tested?
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The benchmark tests different approaches to check if an object is empty.
In this specific case, there are three test cases:
Object.keys()
method can return an array of keys for two empty objects (xxx
and yyy
).JSON.stringify()
method can convert two empty objects (xxx
and yyy
) to their JSON representations.for...in
loop can check if an object is empty by iterating over its keys.Options compared
The three options being tested are:
Object.keys()
method to check if an object is emptyJSON.stringify()
method to convert an object to its JSON representation and then checking if the resulting string is equal to {}
(the JSON representation of an empty object)for...in
loop to iterate over the keys of an object and check if it's emptyPros and cons of each approach
object.keys()
for simple cases.Object.keys()
.Library usage
None of the test cases explicitly uses any external libraries. However, it's worth noting that some browsers or environments might provide additional functionality or optimizations for certain methods (e.g., JSON.stringify()
).
Special JS features or syntax
The test case uses the for...in
loop, which is a legacy feature from older JavaScript versions. While it's still supported in modern browsers and engines, its use is generally discouraged in favor of more modern iteration techniques like for...of
or Object.keys()
.