var xxx = {}
Object.keys(xxx) === 0
JSON.stringify(xxx) === "{}"
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
object.keys() | |
JSON.stringify() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
object.keys() | 60411324.0 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify() | 14395652.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
Benchmark Definition:
The benchmark measures the fastest way to check if an object is empty. This involves comparing two approaches:
Object.keys()
: The first test case checks if an object is empty by using the Object.keys()
method, which returns an array of strings representing the property names in the object. If the object is empty, the length of this array should be 0.JSON.stringify()
: The second test case checks if an object is empty by converting it to a JSON string using JSON.stringify()
. An empty object should result in an empty string.Pros and Cons:
Object.keys()
: This approach has the advantage of being concise and straightforward. It's also generally faster than JSON.stringify()
, as it only iterates over the object's properties, whereas JSON.stringify()
needs to serialize the entire object.JSON.stringify()
: This approach has the advantage of being able to handle complex data structures and even nested objects. However, it's generally slower than Object.keys()
, as it needs to serialize the entire object.Library:
In both test cases, no external libraries are used. However, if we were to implement a more complex data structure or algorithm, we might consider using libraries like Lodash or Underscore.js.
Special JS Features/Syntax:
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in the benchmark definition. The code is straightforward and follows standard JavaScript conventions.
Other Alternatives:
If you wanted to check if an object is empty, other alternatives could include:
Object.getOwnPropertyNames()
instead of Object.keys()