Benchmark: elielieli - MeasureThat.net

Script Preparation code:

var arr = [0,1,2,3,4];

Tests:

tilda
if (~arr.indexOf(4)) { console.log('found')}
equals
if (arr.indexOf(4) > -1 ) { console.log('found')}

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
tilda
equals

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition JSON**

The provided Benchmark Definition JSON represents a simple benchmark that tests two different approaches for checking if a value exists in an array: the tilde (~) operator and the equals (=) operator with a negative comparison.

Here's what's being tested:

1. The `Script Preparation Code` section defines an array `arr` with five elements.
2. The first test case, "tilda", uses the tilde operator (~) to check if the value 4 exists in the array. If it does, the code inside the if statement is executed.
3. The second test case, "equals", uses a negative comparison (arr.indexOf(4) > -1) with the equals (=) operator to check if the value 4 exists in the array.

**Options Compared**

The two options being compared are:

* Tilde (~) operator: This operator returns -1 if the element is not found, and 0 or a positive number if it's found. It's often used for conditional statements where you need to determine whether a condition is true or false.
* Equals (=) operator with negative comparison: This approach uses the `indexOf` method to search for the value in the array. If the value is not found, `indexOf` returns -1.

**Pros and Cons**

Here are some pros and cons of each approach:

Tilde (~) Operator:

Pros:

* Generally faster than using `indexOf`
* Can be more efficient when used with conditional statements

Cons:

* May not work as expected for arrays with duplicate values or NaN (Not a Number) values
* Can lead to unexpected behavior if not used correctly

Equals (=) Operator with Negative Comparison:

Pros:

* More readable and intuitive for some developers
* Works well with arrays containing duplicate values or NaN values

Cons:

* Generally slower than using the tilde operator (~)
* May require more calculations when dealing with large arrays

**Library**

In this benchmark, there is no explicit library mentioned. However, it's worth noting that the `indexOf` method used in the "equals" test case relies on the built-in `Array.prototype.indexOf` method of JavaScript arrays.

**Special JS Feature or Syntax**

There are no special features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.

**Other Alternatives**

If you were to rewrite these benchmarks using modern JavaScript, you might consider using alternative approaches such as:

* Using a more efficient data structure like a Set instead of an array
* Utilizing the `findIndex` method for searching arrays (which is generally faster than `indexOf`)
* Leveraging features like parallel processing or web workers for more efficient execution

Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches can be significant, and it's essential to test your code with various scenarios to ensure optimal performance.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2025 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_12_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/63.0.3239.132 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 63 on Mac OS X 10.12.6

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
tilda	77067.4 Ops/sec
equals	79835.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

elielieli (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: tilda vs equals

Created: 6 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

tilda

equals

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):