var arr1 = [1, 2, 3, , 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10];
var arrCopy = null;
arrCopy = [arr1];
arrCopy = arr1.slice()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Spread operator clone | |
Slice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Spread operator clone | 6093535.0 Ops/sec |
Slice | 7008383.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of two approaches for cloning an array in JavaScript: using the spread operator ([...]
) and using the slice()
method. The test cases are identical, except that one uses the spread operator and the other uses the slice method.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
var arrCopy = [...arr1];
.slice()
method. In this case, var arrCopy = arr1.slice();
.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Library Used
The benchmark uses the null
value as a placeholder in the script preparation code. This suggests that the test case is not relying on any external libraries or frameworks.
Special JavaScript Feature/Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax being tested in this benchmark. The focus is solely on comparing two different approaches for cloning an array.
Other Considerations
When writing benchmarks like this, it's essential to consider factors such as:
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches for cloning an array include:
Array.prototype.map()
to create a new array with the same elementsHowever, these alternatives are not being tested in this specific benchmark.