<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react@16/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@16/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="dest"></div>
const Hello = ({toWhat}) => React.createElement('div', null, `Hello ${toWhat}`);
ReactDOM.render(
React.createElement(Hello, {toWhat: 'World'}, null),
document.getElementById('dest')
);
function Hello ({toWhat}) { return React.createElement('div', null, `Hello ${toWhat}`); }
ReactDOM.render(
React.createElement(Hello, {toWhat: 'World'}, null),
document.getElementById('dest')
);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
function expression | |
function declaration |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
function expression | 167874.6 Ops/sec |
function declaration | 115622.1 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and analyze the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is a JSON object that describes the test case. It contains three main sections:
Name
and Description
: These fields provide metadata about the benchmark, but in this case, they are empty.Script Preparation Code
and Html Preparation Code
: These fields contain the code required to set up the test environment. The script preparation code includes a link to the React library, which is used to create a simple React component. The HTML preparation code creates a basic React app with a single element.Test Cases
The benchmark defines two test cases:
Both test cases render the same React component using ReactDOM.render()
, but they differ in how the component is defined (using a function expression or a function declaration).
Options Compared
The benchmark compares two options:
These are the only two options being compared, which suggests that the goal of this benchmark is to measure the performance difference between using a function expression and a function declaration in React.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
Library: React
React is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces. It's primarily used for creating reusable UI components.
In this benchmark, React is used as the core library to render the test components. The specific versions of React used are React 16 and React DOM 16, which are production-ready builds.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
This benchmark uses a feature that was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6), also known as JavaScript Next Generation or ES7.
This feature is called "arrow functions." It allows you to define small anonymous functions using the arrow (=>
) symbol instead of the traditional function
keyword. Arrow functions are often used for short, simple functions that don't require explicit function definition syntax.
The benchmark uses arrow functions to define both the React components (in function expression and declaration modes).
Other Alternatives
If you're interested in comparing different approaches, here are some alternatives:
Keep in mind that each alternative will introduce new variables and considerations that might affect the benchmark's results.