<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react@16/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script crossorigin src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom@16/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="dest"></div>
function Hello({toWhat}) {
return React.createElement('div', null, `Hello ${toWhat}`);
}
ReactDOM.render(
React.createElement(Hello, {toWhat: 'Worldd'}, null),
document.getElementById('dest')
);
const Hello = ({toWhat}) => React.createElement('div', null, `Hello ${toWhat}`);
ReactDOM.render(
React.createElement(Hello, {toWhat: 'World'}, null),
document.getElementById('dest')
);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
function | |
const |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
function | 36640.1 Ops/sec |
const | 39419.5 Ops/sec |
Measuring JavaScript performance is an essential task in web development, and tools like MeasureThat.net help users compare different approaches.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares the execution speed of two types of JavaScript function declarations: const
and function
. Specifically, it measures how fast React components can be rendered using these two approaches.
Options Compared
The benchmark tests two options:
const
function declaration: This approach uses a constant variable declaration to define the function.function
function declaration: This approach uses a traditional variable declaration with var
, let
, or const
.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
const
function declaration:function
function declaration:var
, let
, const
).Library and Its Purpose
The benchmark uses React, a popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. Specifically:
React.createElement
function is used to create virtual DOM elements.ReactDOM.render
function is used to render the components to the DOM.In this benchmark, the const
approach creates a new constant variable Hello
, which is then used to define the component function. The function
approach defines the function directly without using a constant variable.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes used in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
Other alternatives for measuring JavaScript performance include:
Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be as straightforward to use as MeasureThat.net, which provides a simple and intuitive way to compare different JavaScript approaches.