var array = new Array(65535).fill()
var a = array.map((x) => x)
var b = array.map((x) => x)
var c = array.map((x) => x)
var a = array.map((x) => x)
var b = array.map((x) => x).map((x) => x)
var a = array.map((x) => x).map((x) => x).map((x) => x)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Three | |
two | |
single |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Three | 556.7 Ops/sec |
two | 546.0 Ops/sec |
single | 573.8 Ops/sec |
I'll provide an explanation of the provided benchmark definition and test cases, highlighting the options being compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of different approaches for mapping over an array in JavaScript. The script preparation code initializes an array with 65,535 elements filled with a value (in this case, undefined). This creates a large array that can be used to test various mapping methods.
Options Being Compared
Three different approaches are being compared:
var c = array.map((x) => x)
- This approach maps over the array once and assigns the result to variable c
.var b = array.map((x) => x).map((x) => x)
- This approach maps over the array twice, first assigning the intermediate result to b
, and then mapping over it again.var a = array.map((x) => x).map((x) => x).map((x) => x)
- This approach maps over the array three times.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Other Considerations
The benchmark also considers the impact of the map
method on JavaScript engines. The map
method can be optimized by some engines, while others may not optimize it as aggressively. This means that the actual performance difference between these approaches may vary depending on the JavaScript engine being used.
Test Case Library (Lodash)
The test case uses Lodash, a popular utility library for JavaScript. In this specific case, Lodash is used to provide the map
method implementation in the benchmark script preparation code. Lodash's map
method is designed to optimize performance by reusing intermediate results.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There are no special JS features or syntax used in these test cases beyond what is typically supported by modern JavaScript engines.
Benchmark Preparation Code and Latest Benchmark Result
The benchmark preparation code initializes an array with 65,535 elements filled with a value. The latest benchmark result shows the performance of each approach for Chrome 119 on Windows desktop platforms:
Test Name | Execution Per Second |
---|---|
Single (c) | 573.81 |
Double (b) | 556.65 |
Triple (a) | 546.01 |
These results suggest that the triple map approach may lead to slightly slower performance, while the single map approach provides the best result.
Other Alternatives
Some alternative approaches could be explored:
map
, a for loop can be used to iterate over the array, which might provide better performance.forEach
or reduce
, might offer different optimization paths that affect performance.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not necessarily lead to better performance and should be tested specifically for each use case.