const stringNum = "42";
const res = parseInt(42, 10) ;
const res = Number(42);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
parseInt | |
Number |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
parseInt | 16671713.0 Ops/sec |
Number | 16748137.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The website uses a JSON object to define a benchmark, which includes the following information:
Name
: The name of the benchmark (in this case, "parseInt vs Number string to number").Description
: An empty string, indicating that no description is provided for this benchmark.Script Preparation Code
: A script that sets up a constant variable stringNum
with the value "42"
.Html Preparation Code
: An empty string, indicating that no HTML preparation code is needed.Individual Test Cases
The benchmark consists of two test cases:
parseInt
Number
Both test cases perform the same operation: converting a string to an integer using either the parseInt
function or the built-in Number
function.
Options Compared
In this case, we have two options being compared:
parseInt(stringNum, 10)
: Using the parseInt
function with a radix of 10 (decimal).Number(stringNum)
: Using the built-in Number
function without specifying a radix.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each approach:
parseInt(stringNum, 10)
:Number(stringNum)
:parseInt
.Library/Features Used
In this benchmark, we're using:
Number
function to perform string-to-number conversion.parseInt
function with a radix of 10 (decimal).There are no libraries or special JavaScript features used in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
When choosing between parseInt
and Number
, consider the following factors:
parseInt
.Number
is sufficient and faster.parseInt
.Alternatives
Other alternatives for string-to-number conversion include:
toNumber()
or Moment.js's toNumber()
.Keep in mind that the performance differences between these approaches may be negligible unless you're working with extremely large datasets.