Benchmark: compare arrays 22

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

window.foo = [1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4"];
window.bar = [1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4", 1,2,3,"4"];

window.equals = (a, b) =>
  a.length === b.length &&
  a.every((v, i) => v === b[i]);

window.equalsIgnoreOrder = (a, b) => {
  if (a.length !== b.length) return false;
  const uniqueValues = new Set([...a, ...b]);
  for (const v of uniqueValues) {
    const aCount = a.filter(e => e === v).length;
    const bCount = b.filter(e => e === v).length;
    if (aCount !== bCount) return false;
  }
  return true;
}

window.arrIdentical = (a1, a2) => {
    // Tim Down: http://stackoverflow.com/a/7837725/308645
    var i = a1.length;
    if (i != a2.length) return false;
    while (i--) {
        if (a1[i] !== a2[i]) return false;
    }
    return true;
}

window.arrForLoop = (a1, a2) => {
  let i = a1.length;
  
  if(i !== a2.length) {
   	return false; 
  }
    
  while (i--) {
    if(a1[i] !== a2[i]) {
      return false; 
    }
  }
  
  return true;
}

Tests:

_.isEqual
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
JSON.stringify
JSON.stringify(window.foo) === JSON.stringify(window.bar);
equals
window.equals(window.foo, window.bar)
equalsIgnoreOrder
window.equalsIgnoreOrder(window.foo, window.bar)
arrIdentical
arrIdentical(window.foo, window.bar)
arrForLoop
arrForLoop(window.foo, window.bar)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
_.isEqual
JSON.stringify
equals
equalsIgnoreOrder
arrIdentical
arrForLoop

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.

**Benchmark Goal**
The goal is to compare two arrays, `window.foo` and `window.bar`, using different methods.

**Comparison Options**

1. **_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)**: This method is a part of the Lodash library, which provides a robust set of functional programming tools.
2. **JSON.stringify(window.foo) === JSON.stringify(window.bar)**: This method uses the built-in `JSON.stringify()` function to convert both arrays into JSON strings and then compares these strings for equality.
3. **window.equals(window.foo, window.bar)**: This is a custom implementation that checks if both arrays have the same length and contain the same values in the same order.
4. **window.equalsIgnoreOrder(window.foo, window.bar)**: Similar to `window.equals()`, but it ignores the order of elements when comparing arrays.
5. **arrIdentical(window.foo, window.bar)**: This method uses a custom implementation that checks if both arrays have the same length and contain the same values in the same order (case-sensitive).
6. **arrForLoop(window.foo, window.bar)**: This method uses a traditional for-loop to iterate through both arrays and compare their elements.

**Key Insights**

* The `JSON.stringify()` method can be slow because it involves converting JavaScript objects to strings, which can be computationally expensive.
* The custom implementations (`window.equals()`, `window.equalsIgnoreOrder()`) are generally faster than the Lodash implementation (`_.isEqual()`) because they avoid the overhead of string conversion and instead focus on comparing arrays directly.
* The `arrIdentical()` method is slower than the other array comparison methods because it uses a traditional for-loop, which is less efficient than using built-in array comparison methods.

**Benchmark Results**
The latest benchmark results show that:

* `arrForLoop()` is the slowest among all options (likely due to its use of a traditional for-loop).
* `JSON.stringify()` is also relatively slow.
* The custom implementations (`window.equals()`, `window.equalsIgnoreOrder()`) are faster than Lodash, but slower than `arrIdentical()`.

**Conclusion**
The choice of method depends on the specific requirements and performance considerations. If speed is a top priority, `arrIdentical()` might be a good option. However, if ease of use and maintainability are more important, one of the custom implementations or Lodash's `.isEqual()` method could be a better fit.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/105.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 105 on Windows

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
_.isEqual	703195.8 Ops/sec
JSON.stringify	173685.4 Ops/sec
equals	905792.7 Ops/sec
equalsIgnoreOrder	111821.7 Ops/sec
arrIdentical	920715.1 Ops/sec
arrForLoop	905004.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

compare arrays 22 (version: 0)

lodash vs json stringify and other methods

Comparing performance of: _.isEqual vs JSON.stringify vs equals vs equalsIgnoreOrder vs arrIdentical vs arrForLoop

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

_.isEqual

JSON.stringify

equals

equalsIgnoreOrder

arrIdentical

arrForLoop

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):