var r = ' '.repeat(10).split('').map(e => 1)
var r = [];
for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
r.push(1)
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string crap | |
bulky loops |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string crap | 2686692.8 Ops/sec |
bulky loops | 30292154.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand what's being tested in the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark definition is not provided, but we can analyze the individual test cases to determine what's being measured.
Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases:
var r = ' '.repeat(10).split('').map(e => 1)
' '
), splitting it into individual characters, and then mapping each character to a value of 1.var r = [];\r\nfor(var i = 0; i < 10; i++)\r\n{\r\n r.push(1)\r\n}
What's being tested?
Both test cases are measuring the performance of creating and manipulating arrays in JavaScript. The tests are comparing different approaches:
Pros and Cons of Different Approaches
Libraries Used
None are explicitly mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, if a library like Lodash or Array.prototype methods (e.g., Array.prototype.fill()
, Array.prototype.map()
) were used, they could potentially impact performance.
Special JS Features/Syntax
There is no indication of special JavaScript features or syntax being used beyond standard ECMAScript functionality.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to create similar benchmarks for different array creation methods or libraries, consider exploring the following alternatives:
Array.from()
or Array.of()
repeat()
functionconst
for variables, avoiding unnecessary allocations)Keep in mind that the specific implementation details can vary depending on your requirements and testing goals.