<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
var obj = {
x: 1,
y: 2,
arr: new Array(200).fill({
x: 'q',
f: 'asdfasdfafdsfasddddddddddddddddddddd',
d: 'asdfasdf'
}),
}
_.cloneDeep(obj);
return 1;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Lodash.js clone deep | |
qwer |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Lodash.js clone deep | 55292.3 Ops/sec |
qwer | 1185387392.0 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to help you understand the JavaScript microbenchmark on MeasureThat.net.
What is tested?
The provided JSON represents two benchmark test cases:
_.cloneDeep()
function from the Lodash library, which clones an object deeply.Options compared
In both test cases, the options being compared are:
The options not mentioned in the JSON are likely controlled by the MeasureThat.net framework and include factors such as:
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief analysis of each option:
Library (Lodash.js)
The _.cloneDeep()
function is part of the Lodash library, a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a set of functional programming helpers. The purpose of this library is to provide a convenient way to perform common tasks, such as array and object manipulation, without requiring manual implementation.
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax mentioned in this benchmark. It appears to be a straightforward test case for the _.cloneDeep()
function and a simple return statement.
Alternatives
Other alternatives for creating microbenchmarks include:
These alternatives offer different features and flexibility, but MeasureThat.net provides a simple and straightforward way to create benchmarks without requiring extensive setup or configuration.