var result = 0;
FILTERS = /\s*\|\s*([^\|\s:}]*)(?::((?:(?:[^\|\s,}]*),?)+))?\s*/g;
var str = "{{value}}";
for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) {
typeof str.match(FILTERS) !== null ? result += 1 : result += 0;
}
var result = 0;
FILTERS = /\s*\|\s*([^\|\s:}]*)(?::((?:(?:[^\|\s,}]*),?)+))?\s*/g;
var str = "{{value}}";
for (var i=0; i < 1000; i++) {
typeof str.indexOf('|') >= 0 ? result += 1 : result += 0;
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
regex | |
indexOf |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
regex | 5746.3 Ops/sec |
indexOf | 2169067.2 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Purpose
The goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two approaches for searching a specific substring in a string: using regular expressions (regex
) versus the built-in indexOf
method.
Options Being Compared
There are two options being compared:
\\s*\\|\\s*([^\\|\\s:}]*)(?::((?:(?:[^\\|\\s,}]*),?)+))?
) in the input string ({{value}}
). The match
method is used to execute the regular expression pattern against the input string.indexOf
method to search for a specific substring ('|'
) in the input string ({{value}}
). If the substring is found, it returns the index of the first occurrence; otherwise, it returns -1.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Regular Expressions (Regex)
Pros:
indexOf
for complex search patternsCons:
indexOf
due to the overhead of compiling and executing a regular expression patternBuilt-in indexOf Method
Pros:
regex
for simple searches, as it's optimized for performanceregex
Cons:
regex
, as it only searches for an exact substring matchLibrary/Functionality Used
In both test cases, the match
method from JavaScript's String prototype is used to execute the regular expression pattern. This method returns an array containing information about the matched strings.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
The provided benchmark uses the \\s*
and [^\\|\\s:}]
special characters in the regular expression patterns, which are part of standard JavaScript syntax. These characters have special meanings in regular expressions:
\s*
matches zero or more whitespace characters[^\\|\\s:}]
matches any character that is not a pipe (|
), whitespace (\s
), colon (:
), or curly bracket ({}
)Other Alternatives
If the benchmark were to compare other approaches, some alternatives could be:
includes()
(available in ECMAScript 2019 and later) or split()
Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the use case, as well as the characteristics of the input data.