var str = "According to that, indexOf is just a little bit faster. Of course, it does depend on what you are indexing.IndexOf looks for the first occurrence and lastIndexOf returns to the last occurrence. That all said, their are much better functions around now like map.To be honest though, if Google is using it there is probably a good reason.";
var n = str.lastIndexOf("havent string", 0);
var str = "According to that, indexOf is just a little bit faster. Of course, it does depend on what you are indexing.IndexOf looks for the first occurrence and lastIndexOf returns to the last occurrence. That all said, their are much better functions around now like map.To be honest though, if Google is using it there is probably a good reason.";
var n = str.indexOf("havent string", 0);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
lastIndexOf | |
indexOf |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
lastIndexOf | 30921458.0 Ops/sec |
indexOf | 798050816.0 Ops/sec |
This benchmark compares the performance of two JavaScript string methods: indexOf()
and lastIndexOf()
.
What's being tested?
The benchmark measures how many times each method can successfully find a specific substring within a larger string in a given amount of time. The substring is "havent string", and both tests use startIndex
set to 0.
indexOf()
: This method returns the first occurrence of the substring within the string, starting from the specified index (in this case, 0).lastIndexOf()
: This method returns the last occurrence of the substring within the string, starting from the specified index (again, 0 in this case).Options Compared:
The benchmark directly compares indexOf()
and lastIndexOf()
. It doesn't offer alternative libraries or approaches because it focuses on built-in JavaScript functionality.
Pros and Cons:
indexOf()
:lastIndexOf()
when searching for the first occurrence of a substring. lastIndexOf()
:indexOf()
because it needs to scan the entire string backward.Alternatives: While not explored in this benchmark, alternative methods for finding substrings include:
RegExp
): Offer more complex pattern matching capabilities but can be slower than built-in string methods for simple searches.Key Considerations:
lastIndexOf()
's performance degrades more noticeably with longer strings because it needs to traverse the entire string backward.indexOf()
for finding the first occurrence and lastIndexOf()
for the last occurrence.Let me know if you have any other questions!