Benchmark: Testing jQuery Perfomance

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="my-id">
    <div class="grand">
        <div class="parent"> Awesome stuff! </div>
        <div class="my-class">
            <p> I like carrots! </p>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

$(' div#my-id div.grand div.parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc"); //case-1
$(' #my-id .grand .parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc"); //case-2
$(' #my-id .grand .parent .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc"); //case-3
$(' #my-id').find('.my-class').css("background-color", "#cccccc"); //case-3

Tests:

case-1
$(' div#my-id div.grand div.parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-2
$(' #my-id .grand .parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-3
$(' #my-id .grand .parent .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-4
$(' #my-id').find('.my-class').css("background-color", "#cccccc");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
case-1
case-2
case-3
case-4

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/100.0.4896.75 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 100 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
case-1	667674.4 Ops/sec
case-2	695454.6 Ops/sec
case-3	688936.2 Ops/sec
case-4	225458.7 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the benchmark and its test cases.

**Benchmark Overview**

The benchmark is designed to measure the performance of jQuery, a popular JavaScript library used for DOM manipulation. The benchmark prepares an HTML document with multiple elements and then applies CSS styles to these elements using various jQuery methods.

**Test Cases**

There are four test cases:

1. **Case 1**: `$(' div#my-id div.grand div.parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* This method targets a direct descendant of the element with ID "my-id" and applies the CSS style to it.
2. **Case 2**: `$(' #my-id .grand .parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* This method targets an ancestor of the element with class ".my-class" inside the element with ID "my-id".
3. **Case 3**: `$(' #my-id .grand .parent .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* This method targets a direct descendant of the element with class ".my-class" inside the ancestor of the element with class ".grand" inside the element with ID "my-id".
4. **Case 4**: `$(' #my-id').find('.my-class').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* This method targets all elements with class ".my-class" that are descendants of the element with ID "my-id".

**Comparison and Analysis**

The benchmark is comparing the performance of different jQuery methods:

1. **Direct Descendant**: `$(' div#my-id div.grand div.parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* Pros: Fast, as it only needs to traverse a single level in the DOM.
	* Cons: May not work correctly if the element is not directly under the target element.
2. **Ancestor**: `$(' #my-id .grand .parent div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* Pros: Works even if the element with class ".my-class" is not directly under the target element.
	* Cons: May be slower, as it needs to traverse multiple levels in the DOM.
3. **Descendant**: `$(' #my-id .grand .parent .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* Pros: Works correctly even if the element with class ".my-class" is not directly under the target element.
	* Cons: May be slower, as it needs to traverse multiple levels in the DOM.
4. **Find**: `$(' #my-id').find('.my-class').css("background-color", "#cccccc");`
	* Pros: Works even if the element with class ".my-class" is not directly under the target element.
	* Cons: May be slower, as it needs to traverse multiple levels in the DOM.

**Library and Features**

The benchmark uses jQuery version 3.3.1. The `find` method is used to find elements that match a certain selector within a set of elements. This method is useful when you need to search for elements within a container element, but it can be slower than other methods if the container element has many children.

**Other Alternatives**

If you want to write your own benchmark or compare performance in another JavaScript library, consider using:

1. **V8 Benchmark Suite**: A widely used benchmarking framework that supports multiple JavaScript engines and libraries.
2. **JsPerf**: A popular online benchmarking tool for comparing the performance of JavaScript code.
3. **Benchmark.js**: A lightweight benchmarking library that allows you to write custom benchmarks.

Keep in mind that each benchmarking tool has its own strengths and weaknesses, so choose the one that best fits your needs.

Related benchmarks:

Testing jQuery Perfomance (version: 0)

test

Comparing performance of: case-1 vs case-2 vs case-3 vs case-4

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

case-1

case-2

case-3

case-4

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 2 months ago):