Benchmark: CSS selector best performance

HTML Preparation code:

<div id="my-id">
    <div class="grand">
        <div class="my-class">
            <p> I like carrots! </p>
        </div>
    </div>
</div>
<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.js'></script>

Tests:

case-1
$(' div#my-id div.grand div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-2
$(' #my-id .grand div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-3
$(' #my-id .grand .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-4
$(' div#my-id div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-5
$(' #my-id div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-6
$(' #my-id .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-7
$(' div.my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");
case-8
$(' .my-class ').css("background-color", "#cccccc");

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
case-1
case-2
case-3
case-4
case-5
case-6
case-7
case-8

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 24 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the provided JSON data and explain what is being tested, the options compared, their pros and cons, and other considerations.

**What is being tested?**

MeasureThat.net is testing the performance of different CSS selector specificity levels in jQuery. The goal is to measure how specific selectors affect the execution time of a simple CSS operation: setting the background color of an element.

The test cases use different combinations of CSS selectors with varying specificity levels:

1. `div#my-id div.grand div.my-class` (most specific)
2. `#my-id .grand div.my-class` (specific, but not as specific as 1)
3. `div#my-id div.my-class` (less specific than 1 and 2)
4. `#my-id .my-class` (even less specific than 3)
5. `.my-class` (least specific)

**Options compared**

The options being compared are the performance of each CSS selector specificity level.

**Pros and Cons**

Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:

1. **Most specific: `div#my-id div.grand div.my-class`**
	* Pros: Fastest execution time, as it directly targets the exact element.
	* Cons: May not be practical for most use cases, as it requires precise HTML structure.
2. **Specific but not as specific: `#my-id .grand div.my-class`**
	* Pros: Balances specificity with simplicity, reducing unnecessary complexity.
	* Cons: May still require additional selectors to target the exact element.
3. **Less specific than 1 and 2: `div#my-id div.my-class`**
	* Pros: Easier to write and maintain, as it requires fewer selectors.
	* Cons: Slower execution time, as it targets a broader range of elements.
4. **Even less specific than 3: `#my-id .my-class`**
	* Pros: Simple and concise, making it easy to read and write.
	* Cons: Slowest execution time, as it targets multiple elements with the same class.
5. **Least specific: `.my-class`**
	* Pros: Easy to apply styles to all elements with the same class.
	* Cons: Slower execution time, as it targets many elements.

**Other considerations**

1. **Library:** jQuery is used in this benchmark. jQuery provides a convenient way to select elements on the page and perform DOM operations.
2. **Special JS feature or syntax:** There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes mentioned in the provided code snippets.

**Alternatives**

If you're looking for alternatives, you can use other CSS selectors or libraries that provide similar functionality. Some options include:

* CSS preprocessors like Sass or Less, which allow for more complex and customizable CSS.
* Modern JavaScript libraries like React or Angular, which provide their own DOM manipulation APIs.
* Pure CSS approaches using techniques like query selection or custom properties.

Keep in mind that the specific use case and performance requirements will influence the choice of alternative solution.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 months ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 126 on Linux

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
case-1	215994.0 Ops/sec
case-2	158745.1 Ops/sec
case-3	167120.9 Ops/sec
case-4	150866.3 Ops/sec
case-5	148760.7 Ops/sec
case-6	133746.7 Ops/sec
case-7	137130.1 Ops/sec
case-8	143860.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

CSS selector best performance (version: 0)

To measure how more specific selectors affect performance

Comparing performance of: case-1 vs case-2 vs case-3 vs case-4 vs case-5 vs case-6 vs case-7 vs case-8

Created: 6 months ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

case-1

case-2

case-3

case-4

case-5

case-6

case-7

case-8

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 24 days ago):