var g = { e: [] }
g.o = function(x) { g.e.push( [1,2,3]) }
g.o()
let g = { e: [] }
g.o = function(x) { g.e.push( [1,2,3]) }
g.o()
const g = { e: [] }
g.o = function(x) { g.e.push( [1,2,3]) }
g.o()
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
var | |
let | |
const |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
var | 6302616.0 Ops/sec |
let | 6619512.0 Ops/sec |
const | 6103299.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into explaining the provided JavaScript benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark tests three different variable declarations: var
, let
, and const
. The test cases are identical, with the only difference being the declaration syntax used in each case. The goal is to compare the performance of these three approaches in terms of execution speed.
Options Compared
In this benchmark, we have:
var
let
(block scope)const
(both block scope and function scope)The pros and cons of each approach are as follows:
var
:var
have global scope, which means they can be accessed from anywhere in the code. This makes debugging more challenging due to potential global variable pollution.let
:let
was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) and may not be supported by older browsers or versions of Node.js. Additionally, it can lead to issues if the block is exited prematurely, causing the variable's value to "escape" into outer scopes.const
:var
.let
, const
was introduced in ES6. Its immutability constraint can lead to errors if the declared value needs to be reassigned or modified.Library Usage
In this benchmark, none of the test cases use any external libraries. The focus is solely on comparing the execution speed of var
, let
, and const
declarations.
Special JS Features
None of the provided benchmark definitions uses any special JavaScript features (e.g., async/await, classes, or arrow functions).
Alternative Approaches
For similar performance comparisons:
immutable
or class
variables.var
, let
, and const
declarations affects execution speed, specifically looking at how they interact with function calls, loops, and other control flow statements.Here is a basic Node.js script demonstrating this comparison:
const { performance } = require('perf_hooks');
function executeVar() {
let g = { e: [] };
g.o = function(x) {
g.e.push(...[1, 2, 3]);
};
g.o();
}
function executeLet() {
let g = { e: [] };
g.o = function(x) {
g.e.push(...[1, 2, 3]);
};
g.o();
}
function executeConst() {
const g = { e: [] };
g.o = function(x) {
g.e.push(...[1, 2, 3]);
};
g.o();
}
// Prepare a performance test
const numRuns = 100;
for (let i = 0; i < numRuns; i++) {
executeVar();
executeLet();
executeConst();
}
This code snippet creates three functions, each corresponding to one of the variable declarations (var
, let
, and const
). After running these functions a specified number of times, it captures the elapsed time for each function using Node.js's built-in performance module. The results would help determine which declaration method is most efficient.
Remember that benchmarking JavaScript can be complex due to factors like browser implementations, hardware configurations, and environment variables.