var num = 42;
var stringNum = '42';
var result = Number(stringNum);
var result = String(num);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
String To Int | |
Number to String |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
String To Int | 4741848.0 Ops/sec |
Number to String | 4608187.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark being tested on MeasureThat.net.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by two individual test cases: String To Int
and Number to String
. The goal of this benchmark is to compare the performance of converting a string to an integer (stringNum
) versus converting an integer to a string (num
).
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code defines the initial values:
var num = 42;
var stringNum = '42';
These variables are used as input for both test cases.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided, which means that the benchmark only measures JavaScript execution time and does not involve any complex DOM manipulation or rendering.
Test Cases
The two test cases are:
String To Int
: Converts a string (stringNum
) to an integer using the Number()
function.var result = Number(stringNum);
Number to String
: Converts an integer (num
) to a string using the String()
function or template literals (not explicitly stated, but inferred).var result = String(num);
Library and Purpose
Neither of these test cases relies on any specific JavaScript library. The built-in Number()
and String()
functions are used for the conversions.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
One notable aspect is the use of template literals in one of the test cases ( implicitly, as it's not explicitly stated). Template literals allow you to embed expressions inside string literals, making them a concise way to convert numbers to strings. In this case, String(num)
would likely be equivalent to using template literals: '' + num
.
Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Number(stringNum)
:String(num)
(template literals):Other Alternatives
If you wanted to implement a similar benchmark, you could consider using other conversion methods, such as:
BigInt
for integer conversions.printf()
).Keep in mind that MeasureThat.net's benchmark is focused on comparing the performance of these two specific conversion methods, so it's unlikely you'd want to explore alternative approaches for this particular test case.