var arr = ['hello', 'a', 'b'];
let val;
for(i=0; i<arr.length; i++){
var value = arr[i];
if (value === 'b') {
val = value;
break;
}
}
var arr = ['hello', 'a', 'b'];
let val;
for (var value of arr) {
if (value === 'b') {
val = value;
break;
}
}
var arr = ['hello', 'a', 'b'];
let val = arr.find(node => node === 'b');
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
For-loop | |
For-Of | |
Array.find |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
For-loop | 75781216.0 Ops/sec |
For-Of | 89141696.0 Ops/sec |
Array.find | 99229200.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to understand what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of three different approaches for finding an element in an array:
Options Compared
The benchmark compares the performance of these three approaches for finding an element with a specific value ('b') in an array. The test case is simple: find the index of 'b' in the array ['hello', 'a', 'b']
.
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library and Purpose
In the provided test cases, there is no explicit library used other than built-in JavaScript features.
Special JS Features or Syntax
The benchmark uses the following special features:
Other Alternatives
If you need to find an element in an array without using the Array.find
method or For-Of syntax, you can use a traditional loop with a counter variable:
for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
if (arr[i] === 'b') {
// do something with the index and value
}
}
Keep in mind that this approach may not be as concise or readable, but it works across all browsers.
Benchmark Result
The latest benchmark result shows that:
This result suggests that using modern JavaScript features like Array.find
can provide significant performance benefits over traditional approaches. However, it's essential to note that the actual performance difference may vary depending on the specific use case and other factors.