Benchmark: Aviiiiii - MeasureThat.net

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.5/lodash.min.js'></script>

Tests:

Ronnnnn
var l = [...new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7])]; return l;
Gaiiiiiii
var l = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7]; return _.uniq(l);

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Ronnnnn
Gaiiiiiii

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down what's being tested and compared in this benchmark.

**Library Used: Lodash**
The test case uses the `lodash` library, which is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functional programming helpers for tasks such as data manipulation, array filtering, and more. In this specific test case, the library is used to provide the `_.uniq()` function.

**JavaScript Features Used: Array Destructuring and Spread Operator**
The benchmark definition uses two modern JavaScript features:

1. **Array Destructuring**: The line `var l = [...new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7])];` uses the spread operator (`...`) to create a new array from the set of numbers. Array destructuring is a feature that allows you to extract values from an array into separate variables.
2. **Spread Operator**: The line `var l = [...new Set([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7])];` uses the spread operator to create a new array from the set of numbers.

**Test Cases: Two Approaches Compared**
The benchmark compares two approaches for removing duplicates from an array:

1. **Using Set and Spread Operator**: The first test case creates an array with duplicates using `new Set()` and then spreads it into a new array.
2. **Using Lodash's uniq() Function**: The second test case uses the `_.uniq()` function from the Lodash library to remove duplicates from an array.

**Pros and Cons of Each Approach**

1. **Set and Spread Operator**:
	* Pros: Fast, lightweight, and concise code.
	* Cons: May not be as well-known or widely used as Lodash's `uniq()` function.
2. **Lodash's uniq() Function**:
	* Pros: Well-documented, widely adopted, and easy to use.
	* Cons: Requires including an external library (Lodash), which may add overhead.

**Other Considerations**

1. **Browser Performance**: The benchmark is running on a Chrome 98 browser, which provides the test results.
2. **Device Platform and Operating System**: The test is running on a desktop platform with Mac OS X 10.15.7 as the operating system.
3. **Execution Per Second**: The benchmark measures the number of executions per second for each approach.

**Alternatives**

1. **Other Lodash Functions**: You can explore other Lodash functions, such as `_.compact()` or `_.dropDuplicates()`, to compare their performance with the `uniq()` function.
2. **Native JavaScript Implementation**: You can implement a native JavaScript solution using array filtering and other methods to remove duplicates from an array.

This explanation should provide a good understanding of what's being tested and compared in this benchmark, as well as some insights into the pros and cons of each approach.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/98.0.4758.102 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 98 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Ronnnnn	2232128.8 Ops/sec
Gaiiiiiii	4035966.5 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

Aviiiiii (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: Ronnnnn vs Gaiiiiiii

Created: 2 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

Ronnnnn

Gaiiiiiii

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.1:latest, generated 26 days ago):