<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
window.obj = {};
for (var i = 0, len = 100; i < len; i++) {
obj['key' + i] = 'value' + i;
}
_.isEmpty(window.obj);
Object.keys(window.obj).length === 0;
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | |
Object.keys().length |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEmpty | 778061.8 Ops/sec |
Object.keys().length | 815598.9 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided JSON and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to check if an object is empty:
_.isEmpty()
that checks if a value is "empty" or nullish (i.e., null, undefined, or an empty array). The window.obj
variable is created with 100 keys and values using a script preparation code.Object.keys()
method to get an array of the object's own enumerable property names, and then checks if the length of that array is 0.Options Compared
The two options being compared are:
_.isEmpty()
functionObject.keys()
and a simple comparisonPros and Cons
Library - Lodash
The Lodash library is a popular utility function collection for JavaScript. _.isEmpty()
is one of its many useful functions that provides a quick way to check if a value is empty or nullish.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There doesn't appear to be any special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Other Considerations
When writing benchmarks, it's essential to consider the following:
Other Alternatives
If you'd like to explore alternative approaches, consider using:
Object.keys()
, other built-in methods like Array.prototype.length
and Map.prototype.size
could be used.Keep in mind that the choice of approach depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and desired level of complexity.