var obj = {a: { e: { i: 6, title: "", desc: "" }, items: [] }, b: { e: {g: {}}} };
const i = obj.a.e.i;
console.log(i);
const {a: {e: {i}}} = obj;
console.log(i);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Assign | |
Destructure |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Assign | 110466.5 Ops/sec |
Destructure | 113059.5 Ops/sec |
I'd be happy to explain the benchmark and its test cases.
Benchmark Definition
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmark called "Assignment of value vs Destructuring an object v2". The purpose of this benchmark is to compare the performance of two approaches: assigning a value directly and using destructuring to extract values from an object.
Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code sets up a sample object obj
with nested properties:
var obj = {a: { e: { i: 6, title: "", desc: "" }, items: [] }, b: { e: {g: {} } }};
This object represents a real-world scenario where you might want to extract values from an object.
Html Preparation Code
The HTML preparation code is empty (null
), which means that the benchmark doesn't require any HTML setup or rendering.
Individual Test Cases
There are two test cases:
i
directly:const i = obj.a.e.i;
console.log(i);
i
from the object:const {a: {e: {i}}} = obj;
console.log(i);
Comparison of Options
The benchmark compares two approaches:
i
using a variable.i
from the object.Pros and Cons:
Library and Special JS Features
There is no specific library used in this benchmark. However, the test cases use modern JavaScript features like:
These features are widely supported in most modern browsers and Node.js environments.
Other Alternatives
If you wanted to compare alternative approaches, some options could include:
obj.a.e.i()
[obj.a.e.i]
However, these alternatives might not be as straightforward or efficient as the original assign and destructure approaches.