"use strict";
class Box {
constructor(params = {}) {
var { x = 0, y = 0, height = 1, width = 1 } = params;
this.x = x;
this.y = y;
this.height = height;
this.width = width;
}
}
const b = new Box({ x:3, y: 0, height: 23, width: 1});
console.assert(b.x === 3)
class Box {
constructor(params = {}){
this.x = 0;
this.y = 0;
this.height = 1;
this.width = 1;
Object.assign(this, params);
}
}
const a = new Box({ x:3, y: 0, height: 23, width: 1});
console.assert(a.x === 3)
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
deconstruct | |
Object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
deconstruct | 331103.6 Ops/sec |
Object.assign | 278221.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two approaches: object destructuring and Object.assign()
in JavaScript.
Object Destructuring
In the first test case, "deconstruct", an object called b
is created using a class constructor with default values for its properties. The console.assert(b.x === 3)
statement verifies that the value of x
is indeed 3.
The key aspect of this approach is that the object's properties are destructured from the params
object, which is spread into the object literal ({ x = 0, y = 0, height = 1, width = 1 }
). This allows for a more concise and expressive way to initialize objects.
Object.assign()
In the second test case, "Object.assign", an object called a
is created using a class constructor that uses Object.assign()
to merge the default values with the provided params
object. The console.assert(a.x === 3)
statement verifies that the value of x
is indeed 3.
The key aspect of this approach is that Object.assign()
is used to update the existing object (this
) with new properties from the params
object. This allows for a more explicit way to merge objects.
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
Object.assign()
to merge the default values with the provided params
object, which can be more explicit but also slightly less readable.Pros and Cons
Object Destructuring
Pros:
Cons:
params
is null or undefined?)Object.assign()
Pros:
Object.assign()
syntaxCons:
Other Considerations
Object.assign()
provides a more explicit way to merge objects.Libraries Used
There is no library explicitly mentioned in the benchmark. However, it's worth noting that modern JavaScript versions (ECMAScript 2015+) have built-in support for object destructuring.
Special JS Features or Syntax
No special features or syntax are used beyond what's typically found in standard JavaScript.