const obj = {};
Object.assign(obj, {a: {b: 123}});
const obj = {};
Reflect.set(obj, 'a', {b: 123});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Object.assign() | |
Reflect.set() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Object.assign() | 2716035.2 Ops/sec |
Reflect.set() | 1659460.5 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark.
What is being tested?
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches: Object.assign()
and Reflect.set()
. Both methods are used to update the properties of an object in JavaScript.
Options compared
Two options are being compared:
Object.assign()
: This method takes one or more source objects and merges them into a target object.Reflect.set()
: This is a static method on the Reflect
object that sets the value of a property directly on an object.Pros and cons
Object.assign()
:Reflect.set()
:Reflect
object.Other considerations
When choosing between these two methods, consider the following:
Object.assign()
might be sufficient.Reflect.set()
is a better choice.Library
There are no libraries mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, note that some older browsers may not support Reflect.set()
, so it's always a good idea to include fallbacks or polyfills when using this method.
Special JS feature/syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are being used in this benchmark.
Benchmark preparation code and HTML Preparation Code
The benchmark definition only provides script preparation code (Object.assign()
vs Reflect.set()
) and no HTML preparation code is specified. This suggests that the benchmark is focused solely on measuring the performance of these two methods.
Other alternatives
If you need to measure other approaches for updating object properties, some alternatives include:
bracket notation
(e.g., obj['a'] = {b: 123}
) or the in-operator
(e.g., if ('a' in obj) { obj.a = {b: 123}; }
)setIn()
functionHowever, without more information about your specific use case, it's difficult to recommend the best alternative approach.