Benchmark: Find: Native vs Underscore 1.13 vs Lodash 4.17

HTML Preparation code:


<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.21/lodash.min.js'></script>
<script src='https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/underscore@1.13.1/underscore-umd-min.js'></script>

Script Preparation code:

var users = [
  { 'user': 'joey',  'age': 32 },
  { 'user': 'ross',    'age': 41 },
  { 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 },
   
]

// Underscore was loaded last, so this saves an instance of underscore and resets _ to it's previous value (lodash).
var _underscore = _.noConflict();
// This saves an instance of lodash and resets _ to it's previous value (undefined).
var _lodash = _.noConflict();

Tests:

Native
users.find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
Underscore
_underscore.find(users, function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
Lodash
_lodash.find(users, function (o) { return o.age < 40; })

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Native
Underscore
Lodash

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Website Performance Monitoring by Request Metrics

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; ONEPLUS A5010) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/95.0.4638.50 Mobile Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome Mobile 95 on Android

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
Native	3768561.0 Ops/sec
Underscore	1624924.0 Ops/sec
Lodash	1546381.0 Ops/sec

Find: Native vs Underscore 1.13 vs Lodash 4.17 (version: 0)

updated versions

Comparing performance of: Native vs Underscore vs Lodash

Created: 2 years ago by: Registered User

Jump to the latest result

Native

Underscore

Lodash

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A