<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.11/lodash.core.js"></script>
var users = [
{ 'user': 'joey', 'age': 32 },
{ 'user': 'ross', 'age': 41 },
{ 'user': 'chandler', 'age': 39 }
]
_.find(users, function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
users.find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.find | |
array find |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.find | 1691847.4 Ops/sec |
array find | 6572563.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the test cases and provide an explanation for each.
Overview
The provided benchmark is comparing the performance of two methods: array.find()
( native JavaScript method) and _._find
(a method from the Lodash library). Both methods are used to find the first element in an array that satisfies a given condition.
Options compared
Two options are being compared:
users.find(function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
_.find(users, function (o) { return o.age < 40; })
Library: Lodash
Lodash is a popular JavaScript utility library that provides a wide range of functions for array manipulation, object manipulation, and other data transformations. The _._find
method is part of Lodash's "More Utils" module, which provides additional functions beyond the core utility functions. In this case, _.find
is used to find the first element in an array that satisfies a given condition.
Other considerations
Alternatives
If you don't want to use Lodash, you could consider using other libraries that provide similar functionality, such as:
find()
method: If you're using a modern JavaScript environment, you can use the built-in find()
method on arrays to achieve similar results.Keep in mind that each alternative has its own pros and cons, and may require changes to your code or dependencies.