<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.27.1/ramda.min.js"></script>
var obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3};
Object.entries(obj);
R.toPairs(obj);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
vanila | |
ramda |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
vanila | 12354629.0 Ops/sec |
ramda | 11721999.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in this benchmark.
What is being compared?
The test compares the performance of two approaches to iterate over an object:
Object.entries()
method, which returns an array of an object's key-value pairs.R.toPairs()
function from the Ramda library, which also returns an array of key-value pairs.Options compared
In this benchmark, we have two options being compared:
Object.entries()
R.toPairs()
Pros and Cons of each approach:
However, Ramda's R.toPairs()
method has some drawbacks:
Object.entries()
method.Other considerations
There are no special JS features or syntax used in this benchmark.
Library and purpose
In this case, Ramda is a functional programming library that provides various utilities for working with data structures like arrays, objects, etc. The R.toPairs()
function is specifically designed to convert an object into an array of key-value pairs, making it a convenient alternative to using Object.entries()
. However, in this benchmark, the focus is on comparing performance between these two approaches.
Alternative approaches
In addition to the vanilla JavaScript approach and the Ramda library approach, other possible alternatives could be:
for...in
or forEach()
method.R.toPairs()
) or Underscore.js.However, these alternative approaches are likely to have similar performance characteristics to the Ramda library approach due to the inherent overhead of using an extra function call or iterating over an array.
Overall, this benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two specific approaches: vanilla JavaScript's Object.entries()
method and Ramda's R.toPairs()
function.