<script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/ramda/0.28.0/ramda.js"></script>
Array.from({length: 87 - 55})
R.range(55, 87);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Native | |
Ramda |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Native | 568719.2 Ops/sec |
Ramda | 4549312.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to create an array with a specific length: using JavaScript's built-in Array.from
method (known as "Native") versus using Ramda's R.range
function.
Options being compared
There are two options being compared:
Array.from
method, which takes an object literal with a length
property and creates an array from it.R.range
function, which generates an array of numbers within a specified range.Pros and Cons
length
property, which can be cumbersome or error-prone.Library and purpose
The Ramda library is a popular JavaScript functional programming library that provides various functions for working with data. In this case, R.range
is used to generate an array of numbers within a specified range.
Special JS feature or syntax (none mentioned)
There are no special JavaScript features or syntaxes being tested in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to test alternative approaches to creating arrays with a specific length, some options might include:
Array
constructor and specifying the length directly: new Array(87 - 55)
[...Array(87 - 55).keys()]
range
functionKeep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics or trade-offs compared to the Native and Ramda approaches.