var s1 = "2021-01-01T01:01:01";
var n1 = s1.split("T")[0];
var n1 = s1.substring(0, 10);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.split | |
Substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.split | 7717883.0 Ops/sec |
Substring | 125782160.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of MeasureThat.net and explore what's being tested in this benchmark.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is testing two approaches to extract a specific substring from a date string: Array.split
and Substring
.
What are we comparing?
We're comparing the performance of two different methods:
split()
method, and then takes the first element of the resulting array.substring()
method to extract a specific substring from the date string.Pros and Cons
Here's a brief overview of each approach:
In general, Array.split
can be more efficient when used correctly, but it may incur unnecessary overhead if the split character is not present in the string. On the other hand, Substring
is simpler and easier to read, but may be slower due to the creation of a new string object.
Library
There isn't a specific library being tested here. The tests are using built-in JavaScript methods: split()
and substring()
.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
Neither approach uses any special JavaScript features or syntax.
Other Alternatives
If we were to test alternative approaches, some options could be:
RegExp.test()
) instead of Array.split
or Substring
.string.prototype.split()
or string.prototype.trimStart()
for more efficient string manipulation.Benchmark Preparation Code
The provided code sets up a date string variable s1
and prepares it for testing. The HTML preparation code is empty, suggesting that this benchmark is purely focused on JavaScript performance.
Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison between two common approaches to extracting substrings from strings in JavaScript.