var s1 = "1610238974228/hellothere";
var n1 = s1.split("/")[0];
var n1 = s1.slice(0,13);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string.split | |
string slice |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string.split | 44032940.0 Ops/sec |
string slice | 179681904.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to split or slice a string in JavaScript: split()
and slice()
. The benchmark consists of a single script preparation code that defines a string variable s1
containing a URL, and then uses both split()
and slice()
to extract the first part of the URL.
Test Cases
There are two individual test cases:
"string.split"
: This test case uses the split()
method to split the string s1
at the /
character and extracts the first part using [0]
."string slice"
: This test case uses the slice()
method to extract the first 13 characters of the string s1
.Options Compared
The benchmark is comparing the performance of:
split()
with a regular expression (/\/
)slice()
with a specified start index (0) and length (13)Pros and Cons
split()
: Pros:slice()
: Pros:split()
.Library/Functionality Used
There is no library used in this benchmark. Both split()
and slice()
are built-in JavaScript functions.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark. The code only uses standard JavaScript syntax and built-in functions.
Other Considerations
When choosing between split()
and slice()
, consider the following:
split()
.slice()
.slice()
.split()
with a regular expression.Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternative approaches to split or slice strings in JavaScript, consider:
indexOf()
and substr()
(or substring()
) instead of slice()
.chunk()
function.replace()
.Keep in mind that these alternatives may have different performance characteristics and use cases compared to split()
and slice()
.