<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/lodash@4.17.4/lodash.min.js"></script>
window.foo = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
window.bar = ['cat', 'dog', 'bird'];
_.isEqual(window.foo, window.bar)
'["cat","dog","bird"]' === JSON.stringify(window.bar);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
_.isEqual | |
JSON.stringify |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
_.isEqual | 960298.8 Ops/sec |
JSON.stringify | 1156823.5 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided JSON benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Overview
The test compares two JavaScript approaches for checking equality between two arrays of strings: _.isEqual
from the Lodash library and the built-in ===
operator with JSON.stringify
. The test aims to measure which approach is faster.
_.isEqual vs JSON.stringify
===
operator.Comparison
The test measures the execution time of both approaches on two identical arrays: window.foo
and window.bar
. The goal is to determine which approach is faster.
Special Considerations
Other Alternatives
If you need to compare arrays of strings without using the built-in ===
operator, consider the following alternatives:
In summary, Lodash's isEqual
is suitable for complex equality checks, but may have performance overhead due to recursion and object creation. The built-in ===
operator with JSON.stringify
is lightweight and fast, but may not work correctly for nested objects or arrays.