Benchmark: Set.has vs Array.includes Large Collections

Tests:

Set.has (1,000 items)
const myArray = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { myArray.push(i); } const mySet = new Set(myArray); const contains = mySet.has(999);
Array.includes (1,000 items)
const myArray = []; for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { myArray.push(i); } const mySet = new Set(myArray); const contains = myArray.includes(i) ? true : false;

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Previous results

Test case name	Result
Set.has (1,000 items)
Array.includes (1,000 items)

ⓘ Get performance results from real users on your website with Request Metrics.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 2 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/91.0.4472.114 Safari/537.36 Edg/91.0.864.59

Browser/OS: Chrome 91 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

Test name	Executions per second
Set.has (1,000 items)	24836.6 Ops/sec
Array.includes (1,000 items)	24764.0 Ops/sec

Set.has vs Array.includes Large Collections (version: 0)