const emptyObject = { a : '-', b :'-' }
const mainObject = { a : 'aylmao', b :'brrrr' }
mainObject.a = emptyObject.a;
mainObject.b = emptyObject.b;
const emptyObject = { a : '-', b :'-' };
const mainObject = { a : 'aylmao', b :'brrrr' };
Object.assign(mainObject, emptyObject);
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
assignation | |
object.assign |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
assignation | 769894784.0 Ops/sec |
object.assign | 5247464.5 Ops/sec |
Measuring JavaScript performance is a crucial aspect of software development. Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark compares two approaches to modify an object in JavaScript:
mainObject
.Object.assign()
: Using the built-in Object.assign()
method to copy properties from another object (emptyObject
) into mainObject
.Options Compared
The benchmark tests two options for modifying an object:
mainObject.a = emptyObject.a;
and mainObject.b = emptyObject.b;
)Object.assign()
(Object.assign(mainObject, emptyObject);
)Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Pros:
Cons:
Object.assign()
Pros:
emptyObject
) are copied into the target object (mainObject
), even if they don't exist.Cons:
Library Usage
In this benchmark, there is no explicit library usage. However, it's worth noting that Object.assign()
was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6) as a part of the standard language.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax used in this benchmark.
Other Alternatives
Other approaches to modify an object could include:
{ ...mainObject, ...emptyObject }
) to create a new object with merged properties.lodash
library's merge()
function to merge objects.for...in
loops to iterate over both objects and assign values.Keep in mind that these alternatives may not be relevant for this specific benchmark, which focuses on comparing two simple approaches to modify an object.