var list = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
list.unshift({'s':'usd', 'p':i});
}
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':13})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':14})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':15})
list = list.slice(0,1000)
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':13})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':14})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':15})
list.splice(1000,list.length-1000)
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':13})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':14})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':15})
while(list.length>1000){
list.pop();
}
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':13})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':14})
list.unshift({'s':'cad', 'p':15})
for(let i=0; i<(list.length-998); i++){
list.pop();
}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
slice | |
splice | |
while-pop | |
for-pop |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
slice | 67093.9 Ops/sec |
splice | 11701.8 Ops/sec |
while-pop | 11039.8 Ops/sec |
for-pop | 11032.9 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net!
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark measures the performance difference between three approaches: using slice()
, splice()
, and two variations of pop()
(while-loop and for-loop) when adding new elements to an array at the beginning. The test case uses a JavaScript array, which is created with 1000 elements.
Options Compared
slice()
: A method that creates a shallow copy of a portion of an array.splice()
: A method that inserts or removes elements from an array.while-loop pop()
: Uses a while loop to repeatedly remove elements from the end of the array until it reaches the desired length (1000 in this case).for-loop pop()
: Uses a for loop to repeatedly remove elements from the end of the array until it reaches the desired length (1000 in this case).Pros and Cons
slice()
:splice()
:slice()
for smaller arrays due to the overhead of modifying the array.while-loop pop()
:for-loop pop()
:while-loop pop()
, may not be efficient for very large arrays due to repeated removal operations.Library Usage
None mentioned in the provided benchmark definition. However, keep in mind that if any libraries are used in other parts of the codebase, they may impact performance as well.
Special JS Features/Syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are explicitly used in this benchmark. The test cases focus solely on the slice()
, splice()
, and pop()
methods, making it a straightforward example for comparing their performance.
Other Alternatives
If you're looking for alternatives to these methods:
concat()
: A method that creates a new array by concatenating two or more arrays.Array.prototype.slice.call()
: Similar to slice()
, but can be used with non-array objects as well (though not recommended).Array.prototype.splice()
: Similar to the built-in splice()
method, but also allows for specifying start and end indices.Array.prototype.reduce()
: A method that applies a callback function to each element in an array, reducing it to a single output value.In conclusion, MeasureThat.net's benchmark provides valuable insights into the performance differences between various methods for adding elements to an array at the beginning. Understanding these options and their trade-offs can help you make informed decisions when choosing an approach in your own JavaScript projects.