var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ].concat(params);
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ]
var other = [ 1, 2, params ]
var params = [ "hello", true, 7 ];
var other = [ 1, 2 ];
other.forEach((item) => {
other.push(item);
});
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | |
spread operator | |
Push |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.prototype.concat | 15522200.0 Ops/sec |
spread operator | 55946756.0 Ops/sec |
Push | 65829440.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare three different approaches for concatenating arrays in JavaScript:
Array.prototype.concat()
...
)forEach
Options Compared
Here's a brief overview of each option:
Array.prototype.concat()
: This is the traditional method for concatenating arrays, which creates a new array by copying elements from both input arrays....
): Introduced in ES6, this operator allows you to spread the elements of an array onto another array. In this benchmark, it's used to concatenate two arrays using ...params
instead of concat()
.forEach()
: This approach uses a loop to iterate over the elements of one array and push them onto another array.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons for each option:
Array.prototype.concat()
:...
):concat()
, and more efficient in terms of memory allocation.forEach()
:Library and Special JS Features
There are no libraries being used in this benchmark. However, the spread operator (...
) is a special JavaScript feature introduced in ES6.
Other Considerations
ExecutionsPerSecond
value for each test case, which represents the number of iterations performed per second.Alternative Approaches
Some alternative approaches that could be tested in this benchmark include:
Array.prototype.push()
directly instead of using forEach()
.Array.prototype.set()
or other array methods specifically designed for concatenation.Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be relevant to the specific benchmark goals and may require modifications to the test cases.