var array = [1,2,3];
array.unshift(0);
array = [0].concat(array)
array = [0, array]
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
arrayUnshift123 | |
arrayConcat123 | |
arraySpread123 |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
arrayUnshift123 | 41567.3 Ops/sec |
arrayConcat123 | 550.5 Ops/sec |
arraySpread123 | 205.4 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what's being tested, compared, and some pros and cons of each approach.
Benchmark Overview
The provided JSON represents a JavaScript microbenchmarking test case on the MeasureThat.net website. The test case compares three different ways to manipulate an array in JavaScript:
unshift
: adding an element to the beginning of an array.concat
: concatenating two arrays using the +
operator or the concat()
method.unshift (spread syntax)
: using the spread operator (...
) to add elements to the beginning of an array.Script Preparation Code
The script preparation code is provided as:
var array = [1, 2, 3];
This creates a simple array with three elements and assigns it to the variable array
.
Html Preparation Code
There is no HTML preparation code provided, so we can assume that this test case only tests the JavaScript engine's performance.
Individual Test Cases
The individual test cases are:
arrayUnshift123
: testing the unshift()
method.arrayConcat123
: testing the concat()
method using both the +
operator and the concat()
method.arraySpread123
: testing the spread syntax (...
) to add elements to the beginning of an array.Library Usage
There is no explicit library usage in this benchmark, but it's worth noting that JavaScript arrays are a built-in data structure in most modern browsers.
Special JS Features/Syntax
The test case uses the spread operator (...
), which was introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This allows for concise array creation and manipulation.
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
unshift()
:concat()
:unshift()
, especially for large arrays, since it creates a new array and assigns it to a variable....
):Other Alternatives
If you wanted to test these approaches using a different method, some alternatives could include:
push()
instead of unshift()
.slice()
instead of concat()
.Keep in mind that these alternative test cases might require significant changes to the benchmark code and may not provide comparable results.
Overall, this benchmark provides a useful comparison of three common ways to manipulate arrays in JavaScript, allowing users to evaluate their own coding choices and optimize performance-critical sections of code.