var timestamp = null;
timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
timestamp = new Date().toLocaleString();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
new Date().toISOString() | |
new Date().toLocaleString() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
new Date().toISOString() | 1463641.1 Ops/sec |
new Date().toLocaleString() | 693911.1 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases.
What is tested?
MeasureThat.net tests two approaches to generating strings from the JavaScript Date
object: toISOString()
and toLocaleString()
. The goal is to compare their performance, specifically the execution speed of each method.
Options compared:
new Date().toISOString()
: This method returns a string in ISO 8601 format (e.g., "2023-12-25T14:30:00.000Z").new Date().toLocaleString()
: This method returns a string representation of the date and time in a culturally-specific format (e.g., "December 25, 2023 2:30 PM").Pros and Cons of each approach:
new Date().toISOString()
:new Date().toLocaleString()
:toISOString()
.Library and purpose:
The provided benchmark definition does not use any external libraries. However, it relies on the built-in JavaScript Date
object.
Special JS features or syntax:
There are no special JS features or syntax mentioned in the provided benchmark definition.
Other alternatives:
If you need to generate a string representation of a date and time in JavaScript, other alternatives include:
Date.toISOString()
: Returns a string in ISO 8601 format, similar to toISOString()
.Date.toUTCString()
: Returns a string representation of the date and time in UTC (Coordinated Universal Time).Intl.DateTimeFormat
.format()`: Returns a string representation of the date and time in a culturally-specific format using the Intl.DateTimeFormat API.These alternatives offer different trade-offs between readability, universality, and simplicity, depending on your specific use case.