var iterations = 10000;
for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) {
console.log(i);
}
Array(iterations).fill('').map((value, index) => console.log(index));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
for | |
fill and map |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
for | 17.8 Ops/sec |
fill and map | 17.7 Ops/sec |
I'll break down the provided benchmark definition and test cases to explain what's being tested, compared, and their pros and cons.
Benchmark Definition
The website MeasureThat.net allows users to create and run JavaScript microbenchmarks. The provided benchmark definition represents a comparison between two approaches:
i
.fill
method to initialize an array with a specified length, followed by applying the map
method to iterate over the array.Options Compared
In this benchmark, we're comparing two approaches:
"for"
)"fill and map"
)These two approaches differ in how they handle iteration and element manipulation. The for loop is a traditional, low-level approach that requires manual management of the counter variable i
. In contrast, array fill and map provide a higher-level abstraction by using built-in methods to initialize and iterate over an array.
Pros and Cons
Here's a brief summary of the pros and cons of each approach:
i
.Library/Feature Used
In this benchmark, we're using:
Array
(built-in JavaScript array object)fill
and map
methods (part of the ECMAScript standard)These methods provide a convenient way to initialize and iterate over arrays without requiring manual management of counters or indices. The fill
method initializes an array with a specified length, while the map
method applies a transformation function to each element in the array.
Special JS Feature/Syntax
No special JavaScript features or syntax are used in this benchmark. It's designed to be platform-agnostic and testable using standard JavaScript implementations.
Alternative Approaches
Other alternatives for iterating over arrays include:
forEach
: A method that calls a callback function on each element of an array, without the need for manual counter management.++
and --
) to iterate over arrays.Array.prototype.reduce()
or Array.prototype.findIndex()
methods.These alternatives may offer different performance characteristics or trade-offs in terms of readability and maintainability. However, they are not explicitly compared in this benchmark definition.