const a = [1, 2, 3];
a[3] = 4
const a = [1, 2, 3];
a.metadata = 4;
const a = [1, 2, 3, 4];
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Add array item | |
Add random property | |
No addition |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Add array item | 49185528.0 Ops/sec |
Add random property | 874934144.0 Ops/sec |
No addition | 897159168.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark test cases and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition JSON
The benchmark definition is an empty object, which means that the script preparation code and HTML preparation code are not required for this specific benchmark. The script will be executed directly in the browser, and the results will be measured.
Individual Test Cases
There are three test cases:
const a = [1, 2, 3];\r\na[3] = 4
const a = [1, 2, 3];\r\na.metadata = 4;
const a = [1, 2, 3, 4];
Options Compared
In this benchmark, two different approaches are compared:
a[3] = 4
): This approach uses bracket notation to access and modify the array element.a.metadata = 4
): This approach uses dot notation to access and modify a new property on the object.Pros and Cons
Library Usage
There is no library usage in these test cases. The script execution will rely solely on the JavaScript engine.
Special JS Features or Syntax
None of these test cases use any special JavaScript features or syntax that would require additional explanation.
Other Alternatives
If you want to measure performance differences between these approaches, you might consider using:
Array.prototype.splice()
instead of bracket notationHowever, for this specific benchmark, the focus is on measuring the performance difference between bracket notation and dot notation, so these alternatives might not be relevant.