var luckyNumber = Math.round(Math.random() * 100);
var stringValue = 'lorem ipsum';
var today = new Date();
`your lucky number for today (${today}) is: ${luckyNumber} ... ${stringValue}`
'your lucky number for today (' + today + ') is: ' + luckyNumber + ' ... ' + stringValue
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string-interpolation | |
string-concatenation |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string-interpolation | 868941.9 Ops/sec |
string-concatenation | 854878.6 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the explanation of the provided benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark, "string-interpolation-vs-concatenation-performance", compares the performance of two approaches for string manipulation in JavaScript: template literals (string interpolation) and concatenation using the "+" operator.
Options Compared
Two test cases are compared:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Library Used
There is no explicit library mentioned in the benchmark. However, Firefox/113's execution time for both test cases implies that it's using the JavaScript engine's built-in string manipulation functionality.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The benchmark uses template literals (string interpolation), which is a modern JavaScript feature introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). This allows for more readable and maintainable code by enabling the use of backticks (`) to delimit string expressions. While not all browsers supported this feature initially, most modern ones do.
Other Alternatives
While template literals are an efficient and readable way to create strings in JavaScript, there are other alternatives:
However, these alternatives are typically used in more complex scenarios or when dealing with large datasets, and the benchmark focuses on comparing simple string interpolation vs concatenation.