var luckyNumber = Math.round(Math.random() * 100);
`${luckyNumber} your lucky number for today is: ${luckyNumber}`
luckyNumber + 'your lucky number for today is: ' + luckyNumber
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
string-interpolation | |
string-concatenation |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
string-interpolation | 14175007.0 Ops/sec |
string-concatenation | 13336590.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the benchmark and explain what is being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is defined by a JSON object that specifies two test cases:
${}
) in a string to insert dynamic data. In this case, the placeholder is replaced with the value of luckyNumber
, which is randomly generated.+
operator.Options Compared
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to string manipulation in JavaScript:
+
operator.Pros and Cons
String Interpolation (Template Literals)
Pros:
Cons:
String Concatenation
Pros:
Cons:
Library Used
None explicitly mentioned in the benchmark definition. However, template literals are a built-in feature of JavaScript, so no additional libraries are required.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
The benchmark uses template literals, which is a special syntax introduced in ECMAScript 2015 (ES6). Template literals provide a more readable and concise way to insert dynamic data into strings. They consist of two main parts:
For example:
const name = 'John';
const age = 30;
const greeting = `Hello, my name is ${name} and I am ${age} years old.`;
In this example, ${name}
and ${age}
are replaced with the values of name
and age
, respectively.
Other Alternatives
If you prefer to use string concatenation or another approach, you can modify the benchmark definition to use a different method. For example:
const greeting = 'Hello, my name is ' + name + ' and I am ' + age + ' years old.';
lodash
for safer string manipulation:const _ = require('lodash');
const greeting = _.template('Hello, my name is ${name} and I am ${age} years old.')(name, age);