Benchmark: typeof boolean vs === true || === false

Script Preparation code:

var values = Array.from({length: 10000}, (_, i) => i % 5 === 0 ? i % 3 === 0 : i % 2 ? i.toString() : i);

Tests:

typeof value === "boolean"
let bools = 0; for (let i = 0; i < values.length; i++) { const value = values[i]; if (typeof value === "boolean") { bools++; } }
value === true || value === false
let bools = 0; for (let i = 0; i < values.length; i++) { const value = values[i]; if (value === true || value === false) { bools++; } }

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
typeof value === "boolean"
value === true \|\| value === false

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's break down the JavaScript microbenchmark provided by MeasureThat.net.

**Benchmark Definition**

The benchmark measures the performance difference between two approaches to check if a value is a boolean:

1. `typeof value === "boolean"`: This method checks the type of the value using the `typeof` operator.
2. `value === true || value === false`: This approach uses a simple conditional statement to check if the value is either `true` or `false`.

**Options compared**

The benchmark compares the performance of these two approaches, which can be thought of as:

* **Type checking**: Using `typeof` to check the type of a value.
* **Value comparison**: Directly comparing the value with `true` and `false`.

**Pros and Cons of each approach:**

1. **Type checking (`typeof value === "boolean"`)**:
	* Pros: Simple, straightforward, and efficient for checking if a value is indeed a boolean.
	* Cons: Can be slow for large numbers of booleans due to the overhead of type checking.
2. **Value comparison (`value === true || value === false`)**:
	* Pros: Faster for large numbers of booleans since it's just a simple comparison.
	* Cons: Can be slower for single boolean values, as it involves an additional comparison.

**Library and special JS features**

There are no libraries or special JavaScript features used in this benchmark. The code is straightforward and only uses native JavaScript operators and data types.

**Other considerations**

Keep in mind that the performance difference between these two approaches may not be significant for most use cases, but it can add up when working with large datasets.

**Alternatives**

If you need to check if a value is a boolean in your code, `typeof` might still be a good choice. However, for large datasets or performance-critical code paths, using a simple comparison like `value === true || value === false` might be more efficient.

It's worth noting that some JavaScript engines, like V8 (used by Chrome), have optimized the `typeof` operator to be faster for certain types of values.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:83.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/83.0

Browser/OS: Firefox 83 on Ubuntu

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
typeof value === "boolean"	23981.9 Ops/sec
value === true \|\| value === false	9623.1 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

typeof boolean vs === true || === false (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: typeof value === "boolean" vs value === true || value === false

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

typeof value === "boolean"

value === true || value === false

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):