var b = ['lorem', 'ipsum', 'dolor', 'sit', 'amet'];
const c = Array.isArray(b);
const c = typeof b === 'string' || typeof b === 'number';
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
isArray | |
number or string |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
isArray | 7965364.0 Ops/sec |
number or string | 9302018.0 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks on MeasureThat.net.
What is being tested?
The provided benchmark tests two different scenarios:
Array.isArray()
: This test checks whether the array b
is an actual array or not. It uses the Array.isArray()
function to verify this.number or string
: This test checks whether the variable b
is either a number or a string. It uses a simple expression with the typeof
operator to perform this check.Options compared
The benchmark compares the performance of two approaches:
Array.isArray()
function.typeof
operator (typeof b === 'string' || typeof b === 'number'
).Pros and Cons
Array.isArray()
:typeof
:In general, if readability is more important than performance, using Array.isArray()
might be a better choice. However, if speed is critical, the simpler expression with typeof
could be the way to go.
Library usage
The test case uses the built-in JavaScript function Array.isArray()
, which is part of the ECMAScript standard and available in most browsers and Node.js environments.
Special JS feature or syntax
There are no specific JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark that would require special knowledge or explanation. The tests use only basic JavaScript concepts, making it accessible to a wide range of software engineers.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to write an alternative implementation for this benchmark, you could also consider using:
instanceof
operator to check if the object is an instance of the Array constructor.However, keep in mind that these alternatives might not be as efficient or readable as the original implementation.