<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
<div class="test"></div>
for (var i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
document.querySelector(".test:not(.read)", element => {
element.classList.add("read")
})
}
document.querySelectorAll(".test", elements => {
elements.forEach(element => {
element.classList.add("read")
})
})
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
querySelector | |
querySelectorAll |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
querySelector | 562152.2 Ops/sec |
querySelectorAll | 2522214.2 Ops/sec |
Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks and explore what's being tested in this specific benchmark.
Overview
The provided JSON represents a benchmark that compares the performance of two approaches: querySelector
and querySelectorAll
. Both methods are used to select elements on an HTML document, but they differ in their approach.
Options Compared
The benchmark tests two options:
Pros and Cons of Each Approach
querySelectorAll
.querySelectorAll
when dealing with multiple matches.querySelector
. It also requires additional processing when iterating over the results.Library Usage
In this benchmark, no libraries are explicitly used. However, it's worth noting that some browsers' DOM implementations might have library-like APIs for these methods (e.g., Chrome's QuerySelector
API). But in standard JavaScript, both querySelector
and querySelectorAll
are part of the DOM specification.
Special JS Features or Syntax
There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark. Both querySelector
and querySelectorAll
follow standard DOM methods and don't rely on any proprietary features or extensions.
Other Alternatives
For more complex scenarios, developers might consider using other approaches, such as:
:not()
pseudo-class to filter elements before using querySelector
.In summary, this benchmark provides a straightforward comparison of two fundamental DOM methods: querySelector
and querySelectorAll
. The results can help developers understand which approach is more suitable for their specific use cases, considering factors like performance, flexibility, and resource usage.