Benchmark: querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName Test

HTML Preparation code:

<div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div><div class="test"></div>

Tests:

querySelector
document.querySelectorAll(".test")
getElementsByClassName
document.getElementsByClassName(".test")

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
querySelector
getElementsByClassName

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

Let's dive into the world of JavaScript microbenchmarks!

**What is tested?**

The provided JSON represents a benchmark test that compares two methods for selecting elements in HTML documents:

1. `document.querySelectorAll(".test")`
2. `document.getElementsByClassName(".test")`

These methods are used to retrieve all elements with a specific class attribute.

**Options compared**

The two options being compared are:

* `querySelectorAll` (also known as `querySelectorAll()`): returns a live HTMLCollection of all matching elements.
* `getElementsByClassName` (also known as `getElementsByClassName(string)`): returns a live HTMLCollection of all elements with the specified class name.

**Pros and Cons**

* **`document.querySelectorAll(".test")`:**
	+ Pros:
		- More flexible, as it can select multiple classes using spaces-separated class names.
		- Less DOM queries, which can improve performance.
	+ Cons:
		- May not be supported in older browsers or Internet Explorer.
		- Returns a live collection of elements, which can cause issues if the elements are modified dynamically.
* **`document.getElementsByClassName(".test")`:**
	+ Pros:
		- Wide browser support, including older versions of Internet Explorer and Safari.
		- Can be used to get a specific element by its index in the collection.
	+ Cons:
		- Less flexible than `querySelectorAll`, as it only supports single class names.
		- Performs multiple DOM queries, which can slow down performance.

**Library usage**

None of the test cases use any external libraries. The code is self-contained and uses only the built-in JavaScript DOM API.

**Special JS feature or syntax**

There are no special JavaScript features or syntax used in this benchmark.

**Benchmark preparation code**

The provided HTML preparation code creates a simple HTML document with multiple elements having the class "test". This allows the test cases to accurately measure the performance of each method.

**Alternative approaches**

Other alternatives for selecting elements include:

* `document.querySelector(".test")`: similar to `querySelectorAll`, but returns only the first matching element.
* `document.querySelectorAll("div.test")`: selects elements with a specific tag name and class.
* `Element.prototype.matches()`: a newer API introduced in ECMAScript 2017 (ES2017), which provides more powerful selectors.

These alternative approaches may offer different performance characteristics, depending on the use case and browser support.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 3 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.90 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 89 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
querySelector	1183636.2 Ops/sec
getElementsByClassName	3980943.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

querySelectorAll vs getElementsByClassName Test (version: 0)

Comparing performance of: querySelector vs getElementsByClassName

Created: 3 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

querySelector

getElementsByClassName

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated one month ago):