var s1 = "foo|bar|test";
var n1 = s1.split('|');
console.log(n1.slice(1).join('|'))
var pip = s1.indexOf('|');
console.log(s1.substring(pip +1));
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.split | |
Substring |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.split | 80943.9 Ops/sec |
Substring | 83847.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down what's being tested in the provided JSON benchmark.
Benchmark Overview
The benchmark is designed to compare the performance of two string manipulation methods:
String.prototype.split()
String.prototype.substring()
Both methods are used to split or extract a substring from a given input string s1
. The input string is defined in the "Script Preparation Code": "var s1 = \"foo|bar|test\";"
line.
Options Being Compared
The two options being compared are:
Array.split()
: This method returns an array of substrings split at each occurrence of a regular expression delimiter (in this case, the pipe character |
). The resulting array is then processed to extract and join the substrings.String.prototype.substring()
: This method extracts a contiguous substring from the original string, starting from a specified index.Pros and Cons
Here are some pros and cons of each approach:
Library
There is no explicit library used in this benchmark. However, some JavaScript engines (like V8) provide internal optimizations and caching for common string manipulation methods like split()
and substring()
.
Special JS Features/Syntax
None of the test cases use special JavaScript features or syntax beyond what's standard for modern browsers.
Other Considerations
When choosing between these two approaches, consider the specific requirements of your application:
Array.split()
might be a better choice.String.prototype.substring()
could be a better fit.Alternatives
Some alternative approaches to consider:
split()
, but it may also incur additional overhead due to the complexity of the patterns.Element.prototype.substringContent()
or Element.prototype.sliceContent()
.Keep in mind that the choice of approach ultimately depends on your specific use case and performance requirements.