Benchmark: es6 destructuring vs lodash _.getafdooootr

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.getafdooootr (version: 0)

compare performance of _.get to es6 desu

Comparing performance of: destructuring with defaults, empty inputa vs lodash get, empty inputb vs destructuring with defaults, find item vs lodash get, find item vs destructuring null input vs lodash null input vs destructuring undefined input vs lodash undefined input vs destructuring dynamic key vs lodash dynamic key vs oldway vs straight

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function destructuringFn(input) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function destructuringFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { [key]: documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function lodashFn(input) {
  const documents = _.get(input, 'contextMenu.data.documents', []);
  return documents;
}

function lodashFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const documents = _.get(input, `contextMenu.data.${key}`, []);
  return documents;
}

function oldWay(input, key) {
  return input && input.contextMenu && input.contextMenu.data && input.contextMenu.data[key];
}

function straight(input, key) {
  return input.contextMenu.data[key];
}

function test(fn, input, key) {
  fn(input, key);
}

Tests:

destructuring with defaults, empty inputa
test(destructuringFn, {});
lodash get, empty inputb
test(lodashFn, {});
destructuring with defaults, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input);
lodash get, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFn, input);
destructuring null input
test(destructuringFn, null);
lodash null input
test(lodashFn, null);
destructuring undefined input
let input; test(destructuringFn, input);
lodash undefined input
let input; test(lodashFn, input);
destructuring dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input, 'documents');
lodash dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFn, input, 'documents');
oldway
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(oldWay, input, 'documents');
straight
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(straight, input, 'documents');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
destructuring with defaults, empty inputa
lodash get, empty inputb
destructuring with defaults, find item
lodash get, find item
destructuring null input
lodash null input
destructuring undefined input
lodash undefined input
destructuring dynamic key
lodash dynamic key
oldway
straight

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It looks like we have a CSV (Comma Separated Values) string that contains data about Chrome browser executions on Mac OS X 10.14.5.

To make sense of this, I'll assume that each record in the string represents a single test run. Here are some observations:

* There are multiple tests with different names (e.g., "oldway", "straight", etc.).
* Each test has similar fields: RawUAString, Browser, DevicePlatform, OperatingSystem, ExecutionsPerSecond.
* The values for these fields appear to be consistent across most records, suggesting that the data might be from a single experiment or dataset.

Some questions come to mind:

* What is the purpose of this data?
* Is it related to testing JavaScript engines (like V8) or another aspect of Chrome browser behavior?
* Are there any notable differences or trends in the data?

If you'd like, I can try to help with data analysis or interpretation. However, without more context about the project or experiment that generated this data, it's difficult to provide more specific insights.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/75.0.3770.80 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 75 on Mac OS X 10.14.5

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
destructuring with defaults, empty inputa	7329949.0 Ops/sec
lodash get, empty inputb	2041488.0 Ops/sec
destructuring with defaults, find item	2185674.5 Ops/sec
lodash get, find item	1135354.5 Ops/sec
destructuring null input	0.0 Ops/sec
lodash null input	3657750.5 Ops/sec
destructuring undefined input	0.0 Ops/sec
lodash undefined input	3652980.0 Ops/sec
destructuring dynamic key	2267511.0 Ops/sec
lodash dynamic key	1179196.6 Ops/sec
oldway	2335164.5 Ops/sec
straight	2276352.0 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.getafdooootr (version: 0)

compare performance of _.get to es6 desu

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

destructuring with defaults, empty inputa

lodash get, empty inputb

destructuring with defaults, find item

lodash get, find item

destructuring null input

lodash null input

destructuring undefined input

lodash undefined input

destructuring dynamic key

lodash dynamic key

oldway

straight

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 29 days ago):