Benchmark: es6 destructuring vs lodash _.getaf

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.getaf (version: 0)

compare performance of _.get to es6 desu

Comparing performance of: destructuring with defaults, empty inputa vs lodash get, empty inputb vs destructuring with defaults, find item vs lodash get, find item vs destructuring null input vs lodash null input vs destructuring undefined input vs lodash undefined input vs destructuring dynamic key vs lodash dynamic key vs oldway

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

HTML Preparation code:

<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4/lodash.min.js"></script>

Script Preparation code:

function destructuringFn(input) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function destructuringFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const { contextMenu: { data: { [key]: documents = [] } = {} } = {} } = input;
  return documents;
}

function lodashFn(input) {
  const documents = _.get(input, 'contextMenu.data.documents', []);
  return documents;
}

function lodashFnDynamic(input, key) {
  const documents = _.get(input, `contextMenu.data.${key}`, []);
  return documents;
}

function oldWay(input, key) {
  const documents = _.get(input, `contextMenu.data.${key}`, []);
  return input && input.contextMenu && input.contextMenu.data && input.contextMenu.data[key];
}

function test(fn, input, key) {
  fn(input, key);
}

Tests:

destructuring with defaults, empty inputa
test(destructuringFn, {});
lodash get, empty inputb
test(lodashFn, {});
destructuring with defaults, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input);
lodash get, find item
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFn, input);
destructuring null input
test(destructuringFn, null);
lodash null input
test(lodashFn, null);
destructuring undefined input
let input; test(destructuringFn, input);
lodash undefined input
let input; test(lodashFn, input);
destructuring dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(destructuringFn, input, 'documents');
lodash dynamic key
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(lodashFn, input, 'documents');
oldway
const input = { contextMenu: { data: { documents: [{ id: 'doc' }] } } }; test(oldWay, input, 'documents');

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
destructuring with defaults, empty inputa
lodash get, empty inputb
destructuring with defaults, find item
lodash get, find item
destructuring null input
lodash null input
destructuring undefined input
lodash undefined input
destructuring dynamic key
lodash dynamic key
oldway

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

It looks like you've provided a large JSON array of browser performance data, but without the actual values being compared or analyzed, it's difficult to provide specific insights.

However, I can suggest some possible ways to analyze this data:

1. **Browsers**: Are there any notable differences in performance between Chrome 75 and other browsers? Is one performing better than others?
2. **Device Platform**: Are there significant variations in performance across different devices (Desktop, Mobile, etc.)?
3. **Operating System**: How does the performance of Chrome 75 compare on different versions of Mac OS X?
4. **TestName**: Which tests are causing the most variation in performance? Are there any outliers or anomalies that need attention?

To help you better analyze this data, I can ask some follow-up questions:

* What is the purpose of these performance tests (e.g., optimization, compatibility testing)?
* Are there any specific thresholds or goals for these test results?
* Do you have any existing knowledge about the browsers, device platforms, and operating systems being tested?

Please provide more context or details about your project, and I'll do my best to assist you in analyzing this data.

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: 5 years ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/75.0.3770.80 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 75 on Mac OS X 10.14.5

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
destructuring with defaults, empty inputa	7237581.5 Ops/sec
lodash get, empty inputb	2018020.1 Ops/sec
destructuring with defaults, find item	2166894.2 Ops/sec
lodash get, find item	1132740.8 Ops/sec
destructuring null input	0.0 Ops/sec
lodash null input	3630878.8 Ops/sec
destructuring undefined input	0.0 Ops/sec
lodash undefined input	3624121.2 Ops/sec
destructuring dynamic key	2310019.8 Ops/sec
lodash dynamic key	1205071.4 Ops/sec
oldway	908986.2 Ops/sec

Related benchmarks:

es6 destructuring vs lodash _.getaf (version: 0)

compare performance of _.get to es6 desu

Created: 5 years ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

destructuring with defaults, empty inputa

lodash get, empty inputb

destructuring with defaults, find item

lodash get, find item

destructuring null input

lodash null input

destructuring undefined input

lodash undefined input

destructuring dynamic key

lodash dynamic key

oldway

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model llama3.2:3b, generated 26 days ago):