Benchmark: BigInt(a + b) vs BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)

Script Preparation code:

let a = 10
let b = 20

Tests:

BigInt(a + b)
BigInt(a + b)
BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)
BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)

Rendered benchmark preparation results:

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Previous results

Test case name	Result
BigInt(a + b)
BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Latest run results:

Run details: (Test run date: one month ago)

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36

Browser/OS: Chrome 130 on Mac OS X 10.15.7

View result in a separate tab

Test name	Executions per second
BigInt(a + b)	4054619.8 Ops/sec
BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)	2455548.2 Ops/sec

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one month ago):

LLMs can make mistakes. Check important info.

This benchmark tests two different methods of performing addition with BigInt values in JavaScript, specifically comparing the expression `BigInt(a + b)` against `BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)`. Here’s a breakdown of what is being tested, the pros and cons of each approach, and relevant considerations for developers.

### **Test Cases Explained**

1. **Test Case 1: `BigInt(a + b)`**
   - This approach first calculates the sum of the two integers `a` and `b` (which are 10 and 20 in this case) using regular addition and then converts the result into a BigInt.
   - **Execution Flow**: 
     - Add `a` and `b` (result: 30).
     - Convert the result to BigInt (result: `BigInt(30)`).

2. **Test Case 2: `BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)`**
   - In this case, each value is converted individually to BigInt before performing the addition.
   - **Execution Flow**:
     - Convert `a` to a BigInt (result: `BigInt(10)`).
     - Convert `b` to a BigInt (result: `BigInt(20)`).
     - Add the two BigInt values (result: `BigInt(30)`).

### **Pros and Cons**

#### **Pros of `BigInt(a + b)`**
- **Simplicity**: This method is straightforward and requires less code. It might be easier to read for developers who are less familiar with BigInt syntax.
- **Potentially Faster for Primitive Types**: Since `a` and `b` are initially numbers, the addition is likely optimized internally by JavaScript engines, which can sometimes yield faster results when dealing with primitive types directly.

#### **Cons of `BigInt(a + b)`**
- **Type Conversion Overhead**: After the primitive addition, a type conversion to BigInt is necessary, which adds slight overhead compared to working directly with BigInt.
- **Not Suitable for Non-Number Inputs**: If `a` or `b` were not valid numbers, the outcome could lead to unexpected results.

#### **Pros of `BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)`**
- **Direct BigInt Operations**: This method ensures both operands are treated as BigInt from the outset, potentially providing a more accurate representation of their types.
- **Clear Type Consistency**: By converting both operands to BigInt before the operation, it can help prevent type-related issues down the line.

#### **Cons of `BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)`**
- **More Verbose**: This approach requires more code and may be slightly less readable for those not accustomed to BigInt operations.
- **Type Conversion Overhead**: Both operands incur the cost of conversion before the addition, which could lead to performance differences.

### **Benchmark Results Interpretation**

The benchmark results indicate the performance of these two methods in terms of executions per second:
- **`BigInt(a + b)`** achieved approximately **4,054,620 executions per second**.
- **`BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)`** achieved about **2,455,548 executions per second**.

From these results, it can be inferred that the first method (`BigInt(a + b)`) is significantly faster than the second method when summing the two BigInt values.

### **Other Considerations and Alternatives**

When choosing between these two methods:
- **Performance**: If performance is critical and the values are small integers, `BigInt(a + b)` may be the better choice based on the benchmark results.
- **Readability and Maintainability**: If the code base requires utmost clarity and type safety (especially when integrating multiple data types), `BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)` might be preferable.

### **Other Alternatives**

- **Using the `Number` type**: For smaller integers, regular `Number` type (and not BigInt) can be used when it suffices. If you don't need to handle large integers beyond the `Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER`, then using regular numbers simplifies the implementation.
- **Third-party Libraries**: There are libraries like Big.js and Decimal.js that provide robust handling for arbitrary-precision arithmetic, which can be used when dealing with large or precise decimal numbers beyond JavaScript's built-in types.

In conclusion, both methods have their respective use cases, and developers should choose based on the specific context and requirements of their applications. Understanding the nature of the data being processed and the intended performance utilization is key to making the right choice.

Related benchmarks:

BigInt(a + b) vs BigInt(a) + BigInt(b) (version: 1)

Comparing performance of: BigInt(a + b) vs BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)

Created: one month ago by: Guest

Jump to the latest result

BigInt(a + b)

BigInt(a) + BigInt(b)

Suite status: <idle, ready to run>

Experimental features:

Fastest: N/A

Slowest: N/A

Autogenerated LLM Summary (model gpt-4o-mini, generated one month ago):