for (var i = 0; i < 100_000_000; ++i) {}
for (var i = 0; i < 100_000_000; i++) {}
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
++i | |
i++ |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
++i | 21.2 Ops/sec |
i++ | 21.3 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
What is being tested?
The benchmark is comparing two different approaches to incrementing a variable i
in a loop:
++i
: This is an example of postfix increment, where the value of i
is incremented after it has been used in the expression.i++
: This is an example of prefix increment, where the value of i
is incremented before it has been used in the expression.Options being compared
In this case, we're comparing two different approaches to incrementing a variable:
++i
)i++
)Pros and Cons of each approach:
++i
):i++
):i
.Other considerations
It's worth noting that both approaches are generally equivalent in terms of performance, as modern JavaScript engines (like V8) optimize the increment operation internally. However, in some edge cases, there might be a slight difference in performance or behavior between the two approaches.
Library and special JS feature
There is no library used in this benchmark, but it does utilize the built-in for
loop syntax, which is a standard JavaScript construct.
No special JavaScript features are used in this benchmark.
Other alternatives
If you wanted to compare other incrementation strategies or variables assignment order, some possible alternatives could be:
const i = 0;
instead of var i = 0;
(constant vs variable declaration)Keep in mind that these alternatives might not be directly relevant to the specific benchmark being compared here.