array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10];
[array].reverse();
array.toReversed();
--enable-precise-memory-info
flag.
Test case name | Result |
---|---|
Array.reverse() | |
Array.toReversed() |
Test name | Executions per second |
---|---|
Array.reverse() | 18954262.0 Ops/sec |
Array.toReversed() | 33542014.0 Ops/sec |
Let's break down the provided benchmark and explain what's being tested.
Benchmark Definition
The benchmark is comparing two approaches to reverse an array: Array.reverse()
and array.toReversed()
. The test case creates an array of 10 elements, reverses it using both methods, and measures their performance in terms of execution time per second (ExecutionsPerSecond
).
Options Compared
Two options are being compared:
Array.reverse()
: This method reverses the array in-place, modifying the original array.array.toReversed()
: This method creates a new reversed copy of the array.Pros and Cons of Each Approach
Array.reverse()
: Pros:array.toReversed()
: Pros:Library and Its Purpose
In this benchmark, Array.toReversed()
is using a library or implementation that provides an toReversed()
method on arrays. This method likely creates a new reversed copy of the array using some internal algorithm, such as reversing the elements in place or using a temporary array. The specific implementation details are not provided in this benchmark.
Special JS Feature or Syntax
There is no special JavaScript feature or syntax being used in this benchmark that would require explanation beyond the standard language features. However, if we were to extend this benchmark to include other approaches, such as:
slice()
and reverse()
: array.slice().reverse()
forEach()
and modifying indices: array.forEach((element, index) => { array[index] = array[9 - index]; });
Please let me know if you would like explanations for those alternatives.